The Art of Inclusion: Tactics in reaching communities for participatory design

Wildan Aulia; Imam Santosa; Muhammad Ihsan DRSAS; Adhi Nugraha

doi:10.52265/jdi.v7i02.502

Wildan Aulia Institut Teknologi Sains Bandung
Imam Santosa Institut Teknologi Bandung
Muhammad Ihsan DRSAS
Adhi Nugraha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52265/jdi.v7i02.502

Keywords: Designer, Flexibility, Inclusivity, Participatory Design, Tactics

Abstract

This article delves into the practical strategies employed to engage communities effectively in participatory design, utilizing a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology drawing from Scopus and ScienceDirect databases. Analyzing 14 selected articles and incorporating an additional five, we identified explicit statements addressing challenges and strategies while exploring implicit insights into community engagement approaches. Thematic analysis categorized eight challenging areas for designers: community heterogeneity, age groups, gender and priority segments, economic and social factors, physical environment, education and literacy, cultural nuances, and mental/physical health. The insights gained emphasize the importance of adaptable and inclusive approaches for designers involved in participatory design. The review signifies the need for skill development, highlighting flexibility and inclusivity as pivotal factors when choosing approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Brown, Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins, 2009.

V. Margolin and S. Margolin, “A ‘Social Model’ of design: issues of practice and research,” Des. Issues, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 24–30, 2002.

E. Manzini, Design, when everybody designs. An introduction to design for social innovation. England: The MIT Press, 2015.

J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge, 2013.

L. J. Bannon and P. Ehn, “Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design,” in Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, New York: Routledge, 2013, pp. 37–63.

T. Bratteteig, K. Bødker, Y. Dittrich, P. H. Mogensen, and J. Simonsen, “Methods: Organising principles and general guidelines for Participatory Design projects,” in Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, New York: Routledge, 2013, pp. 117–144.

R. van Oorschot, “Participation in design research,” Des. Stud., vol. 78, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101073.

R. C. Smith and O. S. Iversen, “Participatory design for sustainable social change,” Des. Stud., vol. 59, no. C, pp. 9–36, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.005.

A. Bosco, S. Gasparotto, and M. Lengua, “Participatory flows. A comparative analysis of co-design processes in the field of cultural heritage,” Strateg. Des. Res. J., vol. 15, no. 02, pp. 92–106, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2022.152.02.

R. Lasage, S. Muis, C. S. E. Sardella, M. A. van Drunen, P. H. Verburg, and J. C. J. H. Aerts, “A Stepwise, Participatory Approach to Design and Implement Community Based Adaptation to Drought in the Peruvian Andes,” Sustainability, vol. 7, pp. 1742–1773, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.3390/su7021742.

R. Dayaratne, “Creating places through participatory design:psychological techniques to understand people’sconceptions,” J. Hous. Built Environ., vol. 31, pp. 719–741, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10901-016-9497-2.

J. W. Robinson, Jr. and G. P. Green, “Developing communities,” in Introduction to Community Development. Theory, Practice, and Service-Learning, USA: SAGE, 2011, pp. 8–17.

J. W. Robinson, Jr. and G. P. Green, Introduction to Community Development. Theory, Practice, and Service-Learning. USA: SAGE, 2011.

L. E. Garkovich, “A Historical View of Community Development,” in Introduction to Community Development. Theory, Practice, and Service-Learning, USA: SAGE, 2011, pp. 18–45.

R. Luck, “What is it that makes participation in design participatory design?,” Des. Stud., vol. 59, pp. 1–8, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002.

A. Fasoli and T. Silvio, “Engaged by Design: The Role of Emerging Collaborative Infrastructures for Social Development. Roma Makers as A Case Study,” Des. J., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. S3121–S3133, Sep. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352819.

J. C. Bridger, M. A. Brennan, and A. E. Luloff, “The Interactional Approach to Community,” in Introduction to Community Development. Theory, Practice, and Service-Learning, USA: SAGE, 2011, pp. 102–119.

S. Hameem and Md. Asaduzzaman, “Community Participation in the Sports Clubs of Bangladesh: The Case of Sheikh Kamal Sports Complex of Abahani Limited,” J. Int. Soc. Study Vernac. Settl., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 296–306, May 2023.

B. Wang, T. Ji, and R. He, “Empowerment or Disempowerment: The (Dis)empowering Processes andcOutcomes of Co-Designing with Rural Craftspeople,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4468, pp. 1–28, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054468.

W. Smeenk, “The Empathic Co-Design Canvas: A Tool for Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Co-Design Processes,” Int. J. Des., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 81–98, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.57698/v17i2.05.

J.-J. Lee, M. Jaatinen, A. Salmi, T. Mattelmäki, R. Smeds, and M. Holopainen, “Design Choices Framework for Co-creation Projects,” Int. J. Des., vol. 12, no. 02, pp. 15–31, Aug. 2018.

F. F. Franceschi, J. S. Castillo, J. A. Cherni, A. Acosta-Gonzalez, and M. F. Gomez, “ADPMDesign: The use of a Participatory Methodology to design a dry anaerobic digestion power plant for municipal solid waste treatment.,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 74, pp. 173–184, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2023.03.017.

G. Bertella, S. Lupini, C. R. Romanelli, and X. Font, “Workshop methodology design: Innovation-oriented participatory processes for sustainability,” Ann. Tour. Res., vol. 89, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103251.

A. Soikkeli, E. Santamäki, O. Hynninen, and S. Äijälä, “Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland,” J. Hous. Built Environ., vol. 38, pp. 1889–1905, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2.

K. Bromark, O. Knutsson, and Y. S. Weitz, “Co-designing a dynamic tool to enhance participation for young people: A participatory design project with young service users and social workers,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 147, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106856.

M. Oyinlola et al., “Bottle house: A case study of transdisciplinary research for tackling global challenges,” Habitat Int., vol. 79, pp. 18–29, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.07.007.

R. S. Priya, P. Shabitha, and S. xRadhakrishnan, “Collaborative and participatory design approach in architectural design studios,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2, no. 100033, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100033.

M. François, F. Osiurak, A. Fort, P. Crave, and J. Navarro, “Usability and acceptance of truck dashboards designed by drivers: Two participatory design approaches compared to a user-centered design,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 81, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103073.

M. Zallio, T. Grey, P. Boland, H. Kelly, P. J. White, and E. O’Ferrall, “Online-based participatory design. A Case Study of Developing International Standards During a Pandemic,” Strateg. Des. Res. J., vol. 15, no. 01, pp. 39–51, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2022.151.05.

M. Coenraad, J. Palmer, D. Eatinger, D. Weintrop, and D. Franklin, “Using participatory design to integrate stakeholder voices in the creation of a culturally relevant computing curriculum,” Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact., vol. 31, pp. 1–14, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100353.

P. van Langen, G. Pijper, P. de Vries, and F. Brazier, “Participatory Design of Participatory Systems for Sustainable Collaboration: Exploring Its Potential in Transport and Logistics,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7966, pp. 1–43, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107966.

S. Tunc, F. Nijboer, G. Ludden, L. van Velsen, and M. Tabak, “Scenario-based Co-design with Older Adults: A Design Case on Decreasing Loneliness,” Int. J. Des., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 99–113, doi: https://doi.org/10.57698/v17i2.06.

N. Iivari, E. Tervo, M. Käsmä, and M. Heikkinen, “Participatory design meets gender equality at European higher education institutions,” CODESIGN, pp. 1–23, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2023.2215742.

L. Corsini, S. Jagtap, and J. Moultrie, “Design with and by Marginalized People in Humanitarian Makerspaces,” Int. J. Des., vol. 16, no. 02, pp. 91–105, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i2.07.

J. Kerr, M. Whelan, O. Zelenko, K. Harper-Hill, and C. Villalba, “Integrated Co-design: A Model for Co-designing with Multiple Stakeholder Groups from the ‘Fuzzy’ Front-end to Beyond Project Delivery,” Int. J. Des., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 75–90, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.57698/v16i2.06.

A. Guzmán-Ramírez, J. A. Guzmán-Salas, C. M. Villanueva-Gálvez, and V. D. B. León-Vélez, “Diseño con y para la gente. Experiencia de diseño participativo en la comunidad de Trancas, Dolores Hidalgo, Guanajuato, México,” Rev. Legado Arquit. Diseño, vol. 15, no. 27, Oct. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.36677/legado.v15i27.12828.

P. T. King, D. Cormack, R. Edwards, R. Harris, and S.-J. Paine, “Co-design for indigenous and other children and young people from priority social groups: A systematic review,” SSM - Popul. Health, vol. 18, pp. 1–10, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101077.

A. Rahardiani, A. Nugraha, P. L. Malasan, and R. A. Taepoer, “A Reworking on the Cow Dung Waste Concern into Design. The Case of Cattle Farmers’ Village in West Java,” J. Desain Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 126–135, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.52265/jdi.v6i1.396.

W. Aulia, I. Santosa, M. Ihsan, and A. Nugraha, “Utilizing the Appropriate Technology Paradigm in Industrial Design: A Literature Review,” J. Desain Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 70–86, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.52265/jdi.v5i2.276.